Share every sharing choices for: how Joe Manchin can make the filibuster “more painful” because that the GOP without eliminating it

Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) Leigh Vogel/Getty pictures
top top Sunday, Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) — who previously was among the few Democratic senators who said he was not open up to filibuster revolutionary — opened up the door come making filibusters much less potent.

You are watching: How many votes to end a filibuster

“If you want to do a little bit much more painful — make them was standing there and also talk — ns willing to look in ~ any method we can,” Manchin said Meet the Press’s lining Todd. He later told Fox News’s chris Wallace the the filibuster “should it is in painful if you want to use it.”

As a brief dive right into the filibuster’s background reveals, revolutionary to this obstructionist tactic room not uncommon.

In 1917, chairman Woodrow Wilson efficiently urged the Senate to create a process, known as “cloture,” the would enable a two-thirds bulk of the Senate to break a filibuster and also bring a issue to the Senate for a last vote. The number of votes necessary to finish a filibuster, whether on a piece of law or ~ above a confirmation vote, was decreased to three-fifths of the Senate (ordinarily 60 votes ) in 1975.

In the 1970s, Congress produced a process known together “budget reconciliation,” which permits many taxing and also spending bills to become law through a simple majority vote, bypassing the filibuster. In 1996, congress enacted the Congressional evaluation Act, which enables Congress to overturn current federal firm regulations without having actually to resolve the filibuster.

And in the present-day Senate, filibuster reforms have actually been enacted relatively often. In 2011, a small Senate majority voted to strip away several of the minority’s power to force votes ~ above amendments come a bill. In 2013, the Senate spread a short-term measure that minimal the minority’s ability to delay confirmation votes as soon as the Senate agreed come end dispute on a certain nominee, and a variation of this ascendancy was made irreversible in 2019 (though nothing is truly permanent since a future Senate could always adjust this rule again). The Senate vote to permit non-Supreme Court nominees come be shown with a simple bulk vote in 2013, and also it voted to enable Supreme Court judge to be shown by a simple majority in 2017.

Indeed, this quick account that the filibuster’s background drastically undersells how regularly Congress creates exceptions. In her publication Exceptions come the Rule: The politics of Filibuster constraints in the us Senate, the Brookings Institution’s Molly Reynolds writes that “a cautious review of the historic record has determined 161” provisions of law that prevent “some future piece of legislation from being filibustered on the floor that the Senate.” This has legislation fast-tracking votes on trade negotiations, expediting votes on armed forces base closures, and enabling Congress come bypass the filibuster for certain regulatory and budgetary matters.

Amanda Northrop/ Filibuster reforms, in other words, are rather normal.

Congress took its an initial steps come curtail the filibuster an ext than a century ago, and also the modern-day Senate has commonly placed boundaries on the filibuster. If the current Senate were to make extr changes come the rule governing the filibuster, that would certainly be an extremely much in line with the Senate’s current practice.

Democratic senators choose Manchin (WV) and also Kyrsten Sinema (AZ), that say they protest eliminating the filibuster, execute not need to remove it in order to build a more functional Senate.

Before I obtain into several ways the filibuster deserve to be transformed without abolishing it, however, it’s valuable to understand some that the procedural details behind the filibuster.

Sign up because that The Weeds newsletter’s German Lopez is here to overview you v the Biden administration’s to explode of policymaking. Sign up to receive our newsletter every Friday.

How filibusters work

The Senate filibuster is one of the many unfortunate crashes in American history.

In 1805, fresh off the duel where he eliminated Alexander Hamilton, Vice president Aaron Burr returned to the Senate and proposed streamlining the body’s rules by eliminating something referred to as the “previous concern motion,” a process that was seldom invoked in the beforehand years that the Senate.

As sarah Binder, a Brookings Institution expert on Congress and also a professor in ~ George Washington University, explained in 2010 testimony to the Senate rules Committee, Burr’s intent was to produce a “cleaner rule book” the wasn’t too thick with duplicative procedures. And also he assumed the previous question activity was the sort of superfluous preeminence that might be eliminated.

Unfortunately for the nation, the vault question movement wasn’t the least bit superfluous. This activity turned the end to be the only way to pressure the Senate to relocate off a certain topic. As soon as the Senate took Burr increase on his suggestion, it permitted senators come lock the Senate into endless, pointless debate — halting progress also if a bulk of the Senate wished to move forward to a vote.

The filibuster was born.

How go a filibuster actually work? setting aside exception to the filibuster preeminence such as the reconciliation process, which can only be used infrequently and also has that own collection of gratuitously facility rules, over there are generally two ways to bring a matter to the Senate floor for a vote.

The very first is unanimous consent, a process that is offered quite often for noncontroversial matters or for matters whereby both parties have currently negotiated an agreement. If every solitary senator agrees to hold a vote, then the vote can be booked right away.

If just one councilor objects, however, the Senate might not organize a last vote top top a matter unless cloture is invoked.

Which brings united state to the second method to lug a poll to the Senate floor. Cloture is a an extensive process. Come invoke cloture, the bulk must first present a petition, signed by at the very least 16 senators, which seeks to end debate on a matter. Then senators have to wait. Follow to the Congressional research study Service, a cloture petition need to wait “until the 2nd calendar job on which the Senate is in session. Because that example, if the activity is filed top top Monday, that lies over until Wednesday, assuming the Senate is in conference daily.”

After this waiting period ends, the Senate will vote on whether to finish debate and also proceed come a poll on a issue — that takes 60 votes come end debate on many legislation, and also 51 votes to end dispute on a nominee. Thus, also though nominees have the right to be evidenced by a simple bulk vote, a check vote may still be delayed by a filibuster.

Most Senate Republicans, because that example, newly used the filibuster to delay the check of Homeland security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas. Return the Senate poll 55-42 come end dispute on Mayorkas’s nomination ~ above January 28, the last vote to check him walk not occur until 5 days later.

Without unanimous consent to host an prompt vote ~ above a matter, in various other words, a reasonably small minority of the Senate can delay a last vote for several hours or potentially also several days. Even after ~ the Senate invokes cloture on a particular matter, the minority can pressure the Senate to organize up come 30 hrs of post-cloture debate, although the variety of hours different greatly depending upon what kind of issue is being considered.

When Barack Obama take it office in 2009, he necessary to appoint roughly 1,000 Senate-confirmed cabinet jobs, sub-Cabinet positions, ambassadors, judges, commonwealth prosecutors, and US marshals. At the time, Senate rules permitted the Republican minority to force 30 hrs of post-cloture debate on each of this nominees.

The result was the if the Senate functioned 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, and did nothing however confirm Obama’s nominees, republicans still might have required the Senate to do nothing else for much more than 3 years prior to the critical nominee to be confirmed. Indeed, a 2012 law permitting the chairman to appoint officials to around 170 executive branch positions, without going with the Senate confirmation process, is ideal understood together a reaction to prevalent filibusters of president Obama’s nominees.

To prevent more such methodical delays, a 2019 amendment to the Senate rules decreased the amount of post-cloture conflict to two hrs for federal trial judges and also for executive branch officials exterior of the room (Cabinet secretaries, circuit judges, and also Supreme Court nominees still obtain the complete 30 hours of debate). Thus, when the filibuster have the right to still be provided to hold-up confirmation votes, that is a much less potent device of obstruction than it as soon as was.

Four methods to revolutionary the filibuster

In any type of event, as this short discussion of filibuster procedure indicates, there space four wide ways that senators can weaken the filibuster there is no eliminating it altogether.

Make under bills subject to the filibuster: The Senate can create carveouts and exempt details matters from the filibuster altogether, as it does with bills subject to the reconciliation process.Reduce the power of individual rogue senators: The Senate can make it harder to initiate a filibuster. Ideal now, unanimous consent is compelled to hold a poll without invoking the time-consuming cloture process. However the rules could be readjusted to permit an prompt vote uneven a bigger bloc that senators — perhaps two or five or 10 — objected to together a vote, rather of simply one.Make it less complicated to rest a filibuster: The Senate might reduce the variety of votes necessary to invoke cloture. This might be done together an across-the-board reform, favor the 1975 change to the filibuster rule that decreased the cloture threshold native 67 to 60. Or it could be excellent by creating a carveout for details matters, such together the 2013 and also 2017 reforms that permitted presidential nominees come be shown by a simple majority vote.Reduce or remove the time that takes to invoke cloture: The Senate could reduce the amount of time crucial to invoke cloture and also conduct a last vote. This could be done by permitting a swifter vote on a cloture petition, by reducing or eliminating the time dedicated to post-closure debate, or both.

The Senate might effectively readjust its rules whenever it wants by a simple bulk vote, using the same procedure that Congress provided in 2013 and also 2017 to enable presidential nominees come be confirmed with just 51 votes. (Technically, once the Senate uses this process, i m sorry is colorfully well-known as the “nuclear option,” it simply reinterprets an present rule, however the effect is the same as a dominion change.) So if the Senate’s small Democratic bulk wishes to weaken the filibuster, it has actually the votes to execute so.

With that in mind, let’s take each that the large categories of reform detailed above and lay the end some specific filibuster reforms that this democratic Senate can enact.

Make under bills subject to the filibuster

As discussed above, the reconciliation process permits conference to happen at least some taxing and also spending regulation without having to worry about a filibuster. An additional law, known as the Congressional review Act, allows Congress to override a current regulation developed by a federal agency, and to carry out so with an expedited process that bypasses the filibuster.

So it can be and has been done — the Senate could create additional exemptions to the filibuster, one of two people through law enacted through both houses and also signed by the president, or by creating such exemptions through a simple bulk vote in the Senate.

Allow certain types of legislation to it is in enacted without a filibuster

Because a simple majority is all the is important to effectively adjust the Senate’s rules, senators could create any kind of carveout they want to the filibuster. They could exempt any legislation that is co-sponsored by a certain variety of senators, because that example. They could exempt law that touch on certain subjects. They could even exempt any kind of legislation whose title begins with the letter “J,” if that’s what a majority wants come do.

One especially salient possibility here: democracy in both homes are largely united behind regulation that would strengthen the Voting civil liberties Act, require states to draw congressional districts using bipartisan commissions, and otherwise do it simpler for citizen to practice their best to vote.

But together legislation has actually no possibility of pass so lengthy as a Republican Senate minority can filibuster it. A simple majority of the Senate could, however, exempt any bill that increases voting civil liberties from the filibuster, a opportunity that Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR) floated in an interview v the Atlantic’s Ronald Brownstein. That would preserve the filibuster because that all various other legislation, while permitting Democrats come pass fundamental democratic reforms at a time as soon as democracy has come under strike from the right.

Exempt statehood bills and other law that is not topic to systematic debate

Senate democracy voted to allow most nominees to be confirmed by a simple majority vote in 2013, largely due to their frustration over Republican initiatives to keep particular vacancies open forever — or at the very least until a Republican moved into the White House.

But there is a reasonable to treating confirmation votes in different ways than votes on legislation. The ostensible function of a filibuster is to enable senators to continue debating a legislative branch proposal until they have the right to agree whether to pass that proposal through or there is no amendments. Unlimited debate means unlimited time to sell amendments to a bill. Nominees, however, cannot be amended — the not like Republicans that objected come the Mayorkas confirmation might have introduced an modification to readjust Mayorkas’s see on immigration policy.

So it provides sense that the filibuster should use with less force to unamendable matters such as a check vote.

A similar logic might be used to statehood votes. Back there space some debatable concerns whenever conference votes to admit a new state — such as what the state need to be referred to as or what its an exact borders have to be — the fundamental question before the Senate is comparable to a check vote. Either Washington, DC, becomes a state, or it doesn’t. There really isn’t lot room for amendments in a statehood bill.

For this reason, the Senate can decide to freed statehood votes from the filibuster, as well as other matters where debate is unlikely to readjust the form of a legislative branch proposal in any far-ranging way.

A Congressional review Act because that the supreme Court

Congress provided to provide a significant check ~ above the supreme Court. Together a 2012 study by university of California Irvine regulation professor stack Hasen found, between 1975 and also 1990, conference enacted “an mean of twelve overrides of supreme Court instances in every two-year conference term.” (Hasen specifies the term “override” to encompass acts of Congress the “overturned, reversed, or modified a supreme Court statutory translate holding.”)

But Congress hardly ever engages in such evaluation of the Court’s decision anymore. Hasen’s study found that in between 2001 and 2012, the number of overrides dwindled to a just 2.8 per two-year term.

The supreme Court, meanwhile, has actually a 6-3 Republican majority with wild plans to relocate American law to the right, even though the American human being voted for a autonomous government in the last choice cycle. Republic in the Senate deserve to filibuster virtually any bill seeking to override a judicial decision that misreads a commonwealth statute.

Writing in the Atlantic, Vanderbilt legislation professor Ganesh Sitaraman proposes one systems to this imbalance of strength — a sort of Congressional testimonial Act for regulation overriding a can be fried Court decision.

Under Sitaraman’s proposal, “if the Court authorize a decision interpreting a statute or regulation, congress would have actually 30 days to poll on even if it is to open up a reconsideration process.” If conference voted to open up such a process, a unique committee would then draft law overriding the Court’s decision. Neither the poll to open up the reconsideration process nor the poll to enact the one-of-a-kind committee’s regulation would be topic to a filibuster.

Reduce the power of rogue senators

It take away 60 votes to pass most bills v the Senate, but it takes 100 votes to do much of noþeles quickly. Due to the fact that unanimous consent is frequently the only means to bypass the an extensive cloture process, a solitary senator have the right to unilaterally delay most votes.

When the Senate’s calendar is packed, moreover, such delays might put off specific votes indefinitely. If the Senate bulk leader is racing to spreading multiple major bills, to pass appropriations because that the coming year, and to confirm a bevy of nominees every at the same time, then the Senate might not have 30 hours to spend confirming a Biden circuit court nominee. (Although after ~ cloture has been invoked, the Senate rules carry out that “no Senator shall be licensed has been granted to speak in all more than one hour on the measure, motion, or other issue pending prior to the Senate” — in other words, the minority’s capability to delay a matter is more restricted if just a couple of senators participate.)

The require to gain all 100 senators on plank in stimulate to relocate quickly also creates a perverse impetus for plenty of senators. Senators like Ted Cruz (R-TX) and also Josh Hawley (R-MO) can existing themselves as lone warriors, ready to wake up for conservative causes important to human being who clock Fox News or Newsmax, as soon as every other senator agrees come a unanimous consent request. And also once a single senator objects come a unanimous consent request, many of that senator’s fellow partisans are likely to join the crusade against a bill or nomination to prevent being struck by partisan media outlets.

A bipartisan team of senators is supposedly discussing means to alleviate this problem. According to the Hill’s Jordain Carney, this senators space interested in reforms the would have the impact of “freeing up bills the are hosted up by one or 2 senators.”

It’s not yet clear whether a particular reform will arise from these talks, yet it more than likely wouldn’t be tough to design a brand-new rule that would remove Cruz or Hawley’s power to unilaterally take hostages. Rather of inquiry unanimous consent come move conveniently to a last vote on a matter, because that example, the rules might be changed to allow a swift vote uneven a small group the senators — perhaps five or 10 — all object to such a vote.

This reform wouldn’t just speed up matters that gain overwhelming (but not unanimous) assistance in the Senate. It would also readjust the incentives because that senators who want to puff up your reputations together lone wolves, as it would no longer be possible for a solitary senator come unilaterally hold-up progress.

Make it easier to rest a filibuster

The 60-vote threshold is not created in stone. It no even apply to nominations or to reconciliation bills. And the threshold was reduced from 67 votes come 60 in the reasonably recent past. Yes no reason this threshold can’t be lessened again, if not outright eliminated. There’s likewise no reason the filibuster process can’t be adjusted to place added burdens ~ above a bloc of senators that wish to preserve a filibuster.

Reduce the threshold

The easiest filibuster reform would certainly be to reduce the cloture threshold indigenous 60 come a lower number — just as the Senate lessened the threshold because that nominees come 51 votes in 2013 and in 2017. The Senate could reduce the threshold for all legislation. Or it can reduce it for bills emotional on topic matters such as voting civil liberties or statehood, because that the reasons defined above.

Alternatively, the filibuster threshold can be decreased over time. As far earlier as 1995, because that example, then-Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA) introduced a proposal that would have gradually lessened the variety of votes compelled to rest a filibuster. Initially, 60 votes would be required, under Harkin’s proposal, but this number would certainly drop to 57 after numerous days of debate, and then come 54, and again to 51 ~ a complete of eight days.

Thus, senators who strenuously objected to a bill might hold up that bill for up to eight work — possibly delaying various other matters on a overfilled Senate calendar in the process. But they couldn’t death the invoice altogether without majority support.

See more: How Large A File Can I Send Through Gmail, Send Attachments With Your Gmail Message

Require “talking” filibusters

The filibuster is frequently misrepresented in popular culture. The 1939 movie Mr. Blacksmith Goes come Washington climaxes in a scene where the titular character speaks for 25 hours straight — a so-called “talking filibuster” — in order to block passage of a corrupt bill. The display Parks and also Recreation an ext recently recreated this scene, albeit top top a much smaller scale.