The Georgia Court the Appeals is the intermediary appellate court in Georgia. It was developed in 1906 and also has fifteen judges that serve in 5 divisions. The Court of Appeals has actually statewide appellate jurisdiction of all instances except those entailing constitutional questions, murder, and habeas corpus cases where initial appellate jurisdiction lies v the can be fried Court. The Court the Appeals might certify legal inquiries to the can be fried Court.
*
end the critical twenty years, statistics display a yearly increase in the number of cases thought about by the Court the Appeals peaking in 1995. Return the caseload has remained fairly level since 1998, the cases filed per judge in 2000 still exceeded the national average for intermediary appellate state courts. Also, during the 1990s, the Georgia Court the Appeals was, on the basis of the number of cases decided by each judge, among the busiest appellate court in the country. Regardless of this demanding caseload, the Court is detailed for its prompt rendition of top quality decisions. Over three fourths that the 2,544 direct appeal decision issued by the Court the Appeals in 2001 to be final. Of the staying quarter in which applications for certiorari to be filed, the Georgia supreme Court agreed come review less than 10%. As of the date of this publication, 18 of the 56 applications had been chose by the supreme Court and only 6 to be reversed.Most opinions of the Court the Appeals room reported in complete in the Georgia Appeals Reports and the Southeastern Reporter, and also are available. Over the past several years, the Court has actually published an typical of 1,461 opinions per year.

You are watching: How many justices are on the georgia supreme court

*
The an initial sessions of the Court of Appeals were organized in a courtroom i beg your pardon was situated in the State Capitol building. Initially, the courtroom was used in the afternoons by the Court of Appeals and also in the mornings through the can be fried Court Later, this same courtroom ongoing to be provided by both courts, sit on different days, until the State Judicial building was perfect in 1956. At the dedication proceedings the the existing courtroom, report at 93 Ga. App. 901, the motto engraved ~ above the marble wall surface behind the bench to be noted: "Upon the integrity, wisdom and independence that the judiciary count the sacred legal rights of complimentary men." This credo was conceived and also formulated by Chief referee Jule Wimberly Felton, and also reported in 243 Georgia XXIX.
*
In 1992, in ~ the tip of the an initial woman judge, judge Dorothy Toth Beasley, the Court the Appeals modification its motto to read: "Upon the integrity, wisdom and independence of the judiciary depend the sacred rights of totally free men and also women." These assumed provoking words have actually guided the court fine for countless years and continue to inspire the members the the Court of Appeals.At one time, the Chief judge was elected by the Court and also served in that capacity at the satisfied of the Court. Presently, the position of Chief referee is rotated, typically for a two-year term and also upon the communication of seniority the tenure top top the Court. By statutory authorization the Chief judge appoints a Presiding Judge for each that the four divisions. The Presiding Judges remain as the top of the departments for the full two-year hatchet of the chief Judge. The other Judges are assigned to the panels on an yearly basis. The Court denote this rotation procedure to diffuse the judicial power amongst the members that the court, to offer each referee the possibility to serve with every various other Judge top top the court, and also to prevent stereotyping that the judges, divisions, and also their opinions.The history of appellate courts in Georgia mirrors a continual reluctance to have them at every and, when requirement demands their creation, a continual determination to save them as small as possible. The supreme Court to be not developed until 1845, seventy years after Georgia ended up being a state. Until the can be fried Court was established, Georgia to be the only American commonwealth having a judicial system without one appellate court. At its creation, the first bench included three Justices elected by the residence of Representatives. During the first fifty years, the workload enforced upon the 3 Justices raised steadily.The first move through the arranged bar to minimize the caseload ~ above the supreme Court come at the Bar Association"s 1895 annual meeting in Atlanta, hosted at the cotton States and also International Exposition. This symposium complied with a vote by the electorate versus a constitution amendment boosting the variety of Justices ~ above the can be fried Court from 3 to five during the vault October.
*
The first proposal to develop a court of appeals was additionally made during the 1895 Bar Association annual meeting. In "Relief that the supreme Court that Georgia: Is the Remedy One or an ext Intermediate Courts?", Volume Twelve, page 23 of the Georgia Bar combination Reports, Z. D. Harrison, climate Clerk the the supreme Court, argued: "Let the Legislature establish a competent intermediate court, a court which will command the confidence and also respect the the bar and of the people, and also establish it, too, upon such terms as will make that is entrance straightforward so that every litigant and suitor can enter this court ~ above terms rather as basic as those top top which he can now get in the can be fried Court by writ of error."Among other concepts proposed in the bar association"s report were the facility of 2 supreme courts, one because that criminal cases and another because that civil; abolition the the random fee, limit on the appropriate to appeal; and also limitation that the course of situations which might be the evaluation by the supreme Court. The Association also declined to consider the novel idea "to develop the ideal of attempt by another jury . . . And have a trial by a first and 2nd jury prior to a situation can go to the supreme Court." .Of specific interest in this report space the presentations of W. W. Gordon, Jr., that Savannah and also Joseph Hansell Merrill that Thomasville, which appear as appendix 10 and also 11 respectively. This papers defined a bill all set by premium Court judge Pope Barrow of Savannah, which would certainly have produced five district courts that appeal. The bench to be to be composed of jurists serving in the premium courts and also city courts in the district who would be designated to take care of the business of this courts of appeal. Atlanta, Athens, Savannah, Columbus and also Macon were argued as the places where the ar courts would hold their sessions. Judges were to be payment from the State Treasury at the rate of four cents per mile for travel and also $4 per day because that services.Nothing additional was done at this time towards the production of another court, however in 1897, the supreme Court was boosted to six Justices. This rise in personnel supposedly failed to administer a solution, as five years later, at the 1902 Bar association session hosted at warmth Springs, over there was an additional symposium ~ above the subject. The conversation was based on a file delivered by righteousness Andrew J. Cobb captioned: "The Judicial mechanism of Georgia: that Defects; What transforms Are crucial to Bring around a much more Harmonious and Orderly System and also to relieve the supreme Court?" This paper recites statistics demonstrating that it was not humanly possible for the can be fried Court judge to regulate the workload. View Appendix I, 19 Georgia Bar association Reports 183. Justice Cobb noted, "The working hrs of the Court because that hearing argument and also consultation have actually been, since October 1897, indigenous 9 a.m. Come 1 p.m. And from 3 p.m. To 5 p.m. In the Fall and also Winter and 6 p.m. In the Spring and Summer. These hours, however, carry out not represent every one of the working hrs of the justices." .Among proposals mentioned in this file were limitation of dental arguments, disposition of cases by a written synopsis of the points decided, reduction of the number of written opinions, addition of Justices and divisions, and also restriction of jurisdiction by monetary amount or subject matter. Justice Cobb observed the "ome donate an intermediary appellate court, from which a writ of error to the can be fried Court will lie only in particular cases." . Referee Barrow again submitted his bill to produce district court of appeal indigenous the trial courts of the respective districts, but minimal to three districts rather than five. Each judge was to it is in paid 3 cents every mile and $5 every day "for each day court is in session and he is sitting."The 1902 symposium terminated with passage the a movement for meeting of a committee to draft a curative statute and also designation of an eminent attorney from each Congressional district to offer on the statewide committee to prepare "Legislation because that the Relief of the can be fried Court."
*

The election of judges adhered to on November 6, 1906. There were sixteen candidates; the 3 receiving the many votes were to form the an initial bench. Arthur G. Powell of Blakely (who together with Logan E. Bleckley is concerned as among the very an excellent appellate court judges) composed in his fascinating book, I can Go residence Again, that the original Bar proposal was for the branch to appoint the Judges. Governor Terrell had agreed the he would certainly appoint H. H. Perry the Gainesville, Henry C. Peeples of Atlanta, and Powell, however the home had transformed the Bar proposal to require that the Judges be elected by the people. The Bar Association then asked these three lawyers to come to be candidates, and also only Mr. Perry declined. The newspapers very first announced the the three candidates receiving the highest possible votes were Richard Brevard Russell, Powell, and also Peeples. Instead, the final tally the votes showed that Benjamin H. Hill, the kid of Georgia"s great United says Senator Benjamin Harvey Hill, had beat Peeples by a few votes.The initial minutes the the Court of Appeals suggest that the three chosen Judges convened at the State Capitol top top January 2, 1907, and also determined by lot the size of their corresponding terms. Lock appointed Logan Bleckley, the namesake boy of the legendary supreme Court Justice, as Clerk that Court, and James H. Pittman as the first Sheriff. These first minutes likewise reveal that by can be fried Court order dated December 17, 1906, 155 pending civil instances had been moved to the new tribunal. Later, by order date January 12, 1907, second 24 criminal cases and also one more civil instance were transferred.Dissents arisen on 2 matters at this very first en banc meeting. The statute listed for "short-hand writers" to offer each Judge. 2 males and one female were proposed. Powell dissented as to the woman, asserting that under the then Civil password § 1810, "females were declared ineligible come hold any type of civil office or to perform any type of civil function, unless specially authorized by law," and also that Civil password § 5507 claimed the supreme Court stenographers to be civil officers. His dissent concluded: "If I might find any escape native what appears to it is in an irresistible legit conclusion, I would certainly take good pleasure in joining v my brethren in the an option of this most great young lady.

*
" referee Hill concurred v Judge Russell"s nomination that the lady, stating that because he had "doubt on this question I choose to concur come the appointment, particularly in view of the exercise of the can be fried Court in allow the exercise of an individual preference in the selection of stenographers through the separation, personal, instance judges." Thereby, Marian Bloodworth ended up being the Court"s very first female employee. The very first female attorney ever to argue a case prior to the Court of Appeals, and the supreme Court, to be Viola Ross Napier the Macon, Georgia.The various other dissent developed in the decision of who was to be Chief Judge. Hill and also Powell want the selection of Chief referee to be based upon seniority according to age. Judge Russell dissented vigorously. Not only did he contend that the legislative intent was "that every one of the judges must be equal," however with customary "Russell candor" he said that the proposal was one that was "arbitrary and personal." that concluded, "I have never yet, and also cannot now, give my consent to any doctrine which gauges the strange fitness of any individual for office stop by his age or youth, other than the present statutory requirements. The success and services of ours young males are probably the preeminent glories that American history. Long life periodically brings knowledge however not always wisdom."In an post in the Summer 1948 problem of The Georgia evaluation entitled "The bear of the Court that Appeals of Georgia," referee Powell revealed the within story regarding how Hill was persuaded to poll for himself: "He told me he was anxious to be the an initial Chief judge of the Court, however did not wish to commit the indelicacy of voting for himself. Ns told him the I could avoid that embarrassment for him; that the constitution amendment had made no provision because that the choice of a chief Judge. I reminded him the the same case had challenged the can be fried Court once it was organized in 1845, and also that an act had actually been passed offering that the earliest Justice in commission or (if over there were more than one whose commissions were of the exact same date) the one that was oldest in allude of time should be chief Justice. Ns told him that in the present plans of organization I had been delegated come draw, I can with propriety embody together a provision, and that through his vote and mine it would be adopted, and also that he would so instantly become the chief Judge." . As one reads Powell"s beautiful opinions, one need to remember that once he came to be Judge he was 34 year old and also that he continues to be to now the youngest person to have actually served ~ above this bench.
*
regardless of Judge Russell"s open minded arguments, the rule of age prevailed. Hill, gift 57 year old, came to be the first Chief Judge. Russell to be then 45 but afterwards became chef Judge and in later on years chef Justice of the supreme Court. He to be the dad of the famous United says Senator Richard B. Russell, Jr. His grandson, Robert L. Russell, Jr., was likewise to serve on the Court the Appeals. This Russell mix is the only one of grandfather-grandson in the Court"s history. As the Russells come from Winder, it is of attention to keep in mind that the only father- son mix
*
(Joseph D. Quillian and also J. Kelley Quillian) were likewise from Winder. Of additional interest is the truth that Julie and Clay Custer, youngsters of Mr. And Mrs. Henry Custer the Albany, have the difference of having had both of their grandfathers offer as Judges on the Court of Appeals, viz., referee Vance Custer and also Judge Julian Webb.Examination of the original Rules of Court drafted by referee Powell illustrates the prestige in those work of the oral discussion when "briefs" really meant brevity. Historically, the shortest written presentation in Georgia to be by Robert Toombs and consisted of 4 words: "Marriage-Seizin-Death-Dower." dominion 5 stated that "rgument is minimal to 4 hours upon each case, two hrs on each side, uneven by unique leave an extension of time is granted." maybe the oral discussion did aid the Court, together the Court"s an initial opinion was rendered only three work after oral presentation.However, with the ever-increasing variety of appeals and, therefore, that opinions to it is in written, the oral argument of necessity subsided in importance. Today judicial reliance on the written short has come to be paramount. Compare the initial ascendancy with that appearing on the current oral dispute calendars of the Court of Appeals: "The following situations have been inserted on the calendar because that argument. . . . Generally, the cases will be referred to as in the order provided and top top the days named, beginning at 10 o"clock a.m. Come accommodate the bar and pro se parties, the Court will call situations out of turn in which counsel or pro se next respectively educate the Clerk the time of argument will be minimal to 5 or 10 minutes per side. ."Our 3 progenitors, Hill, Russell and Powell, verified to it is in legal giants. That the work of this jurists to be favorably received by Georgia lawyers is presented by a resolution unanimously adopted at the 1907 yearly bar meeting, which asked for West Publishing agency to add this Court"s opinions to its Southeastern Reporter due to the fact that "these decisions will be valuable not just in this State, but in every regulation library in America."
*
during the an initial ten year of its visibility there to be no review of this Court"s decision by our can be fried Court. The judgments to be final. Apparently, however, the visibility of two courts of last resort developed problems. An resolve by J. R. Pottle the Albany appearing in the 1914 Georgia Bar association Reports (pages 216-226)detailed the conflicts between decisions of the 2 appellate courts (which arose despite the constitutional need that the can be fried Court rulings to be to be binding precedents) and it detailed supporting statistics. J. R. Pottle had been referee Powell"s law partner in Blakely, and succeeded his partner on this bench when Powell resigned to go into private practice in Atlanta in January 1912. Pottle served two years and then returned to exercise in Albany. Thus, he was able to existing these difficulties from the prospective that both a previous judge and as a practitioner.By its 1915 yearly meeting, the workload the the 2 appellate courts had actually grown so much that the Georgia Bar Association reputed it necessary to take positive steps toward alleviation. Noting the for two succeeding years none of the appellate judges had been may be to to visit its meetings, the association passed a resolution, supplemented through an appropriation of $1,000, aimed in ~ "working out actions of relief." part of this resolution reads: "Whereas, claimed courts have been compelled to stay in continuous sessions v no possibility for also the briefest vacation, and also without cessation from your onerous and exacting labors; and whereas, claimed courts space now every year deciding much more than 1600 cases, i m sorry is a greater number than can be disposed of with satisfaction come the bar or credit to the court, even with the incessant slavish toil come which the Justices and also Judges room being subject. . . ."Thereafter, in 1916, the basic Assembly took action. Rejecting the ide of having one court deal exclusively with appeals of criminal cases and the various other with civil, the 1916 Legislature approved for entry to the electorate a constitution amendment which restricted the course of instances over i beg your pardon the supreme Court was to have actually jurisdiction and also enlarged the of the Court that Appeals. This modification was ratified by the world the same year.
*
just a couple of other jurisdictional transforms have emerged since 1916. The an initial was a 1956 constitution amendment giving for direct review through the 2 appellate courts of youth court judgments. In Powell v. Gregg, 224 Ga. 226, the can be fried Court hosted that those cases were specifically within the purview that the Court the Appeals. An additional change, by statute, moved from the can be fried Court come the Court the Appeals jurisdiction end appeals of instances of armed robbery, rape and also kidnaping whereby the fatality penalty is no imposed, and also transferred indigenous the Court of Appeals come the supreme Court jurisdiction in cases involving disputed elections and the validity of legislative branch enactments of municipalities (Ga. Regulations 1977, p. 710).Anticipating i of the suggest 1916 constitution amendment, the basic Assembly also passed a statute changing the framework of the Court. This Act included three Judges come the three already comprising the bench of the Court that Appeals and listed for them come sit in two divisions, with each to recognize "independently of the various other the instances assigned come it." The state directed that "all criminal instances shall be assigned come one division." In adhering to the statutory directive to "istribute the cases in between the departments in such manner as to equalize their work-related as far as practicable," the Judges decided that two criminal cases would same one polite case. In an attend to to the 1927 Georgia Bar Association yearly meeting, referee R. C. Bell proclaimed that "in consisting of the calendars for the disagreements the cases are allotted come the two divisions on this basis till the criminal situations are exhausted, after i m sorry the remaining civil situations are dispersed equally come the two divisions." (44 Georgia Bar combination Reports 232).
*
one of the three new judges elected at the 1916 general Election was Walter F. George, then 39 years old. He offered from January 1, 1917, till October of that year. He returned to exclusive practice and also later had an illustrious national career which consisted of 34 years as a leader in the United says Senate, followed by organization as special Representative the the president of the United states to the phibìc Atlantic Treaty company from January 5, 1957, until his fatality on August 4th of the year.In 1960 (1960 Ga. Laws, p. 158) the number of judges was enhanced to seven. In the following year, the general Assembly by state (1961 Ga. Laws, p. 140) included two an ext judges and decreed that the Court to be to sit in three divisions of 3 judges each, among which was to manage all criminal cases. The assignment the criminal situations to a single division was not eliminated until1967 (1967 Ga. Laws, p. 538).Although remaining a court of ripe judges until 1996, the bench became more diversified in 1984 with the appointment of the very first woman,
*
Dorothy Toth Beasley, and the meeting of the an initial African American judge, Robert Benham, who later on was appointed come the Georgia supreme Court. Then in 1996, branch Zell Miller"s legislative package for the year consisted of a invoice to boost the variety of judges on the Court of Appeals by four, bringing the number come thirteen. The Governor"s plan was because that the Court to serve in four departments of 3 judges each and also the Chief referee to duty as an governmental head of the Court and to help each division. When the branch was not successful in producing four extr judgeships for the Court, the legislature did pass Senate bill 750, which included a tenth judge.That legislation also changed the process by which cases would be decided in the occasion of a dissent. Before the 1996 modification (1996 Ga. Laws, p. 405), cases in i m sorry there was a disagreement in one division were chose by the totality court. Now, situations involving a dissent are determined by seven judges, consisting of the assigned division, the next division in succession and a seventh judge.
*
branch Miller signed Senate bill 750 right into law ~ above April 2, 1996, together Act No. 738. On July 16, 1996, branch Miller swore-in judge Frank M. Eldridge as the very first ever tenth judge of the Court that Appeals of Georgia and also as the sixty-third judge in the Court"s history.
*
Further, legislative efforts to boost the variety of judges on the Court of Appeals the Georgia fell short in both 1997 and 1998. However, in 1999, the legislature passed Senate invoice 59 which was signed into law by governor Roy Barnes. This bill raised the number of judges ~ above the Court the Appeals from 10 to 12 and permitted the Court to sit in 4 divisions. Governor Barnes appointed that year, in stimulate of seniority, M. Yvette Miller, formerly state court judge of Fulton County; john J. Ellington, previously state court referee of Treutlen County and also Herbert E. Phipps, previously superior court referee in the Dougherty judicial Circuit, together the 3 judges to fill an present vacancy and the 2 newly produced judgeships.Laymen who carry out not know the dedication and devotion of bench and bar to serving the cause of justice would have actually predicted challenges in the directive the "ach division shall hear and also determine, individually of the others, the situations assigned to it." In actuality, there have actually been few problems in adhering to this mandate. This is undoubtedly as result of the quality of those who have served ~ above the Court of Appeals. Lock have presented an exemplary respect because that the Court as an institution. This was shown from the an extremely origin the the Court in the case of Gainesville Midland Ry. V. Jackson, 1 Ga. App. 632. There, in one appeal top top a invoice of exception signed by the trial judge on December 31, 1906, appellant argued absence of jurisdiction since the Judges chosen in the November choice did not take your oaths the office till January 2, 1907. In ruling versus this contention, the opinion says, "Counsel for defendant in error has actually confounded the Judges v the court. The court when created became at once, top top the proclamation that the Governor, one integral part of the judicial room of the State, and it existed thus whether there were Judges thereof or not."A distinct relationship has existed between our two appellate courts throughout these ninety-six years, with countless Justices that the supreme Court having actually served previously on the Court of Appeals. For the convenience of the Bar, the two courts have consulted in making your rules, even while recognizing their self-reliance to collection their own rules. Lock have more recognized the require for every bench to recognize its own interior operating procedures. Ninety-one individuals have served ~ above the supreme Court that Georgia. Seventy persons have served together members of the Court the Appeals. Fifteen people have offered on both courts. Only among the fifteen, Richard Brevard Russell, has served together Chief Justice and Chief judge of both courts. One Judge, Benjamin Harvey Hill, offered on the Court of Appeals at two different times.

See more:
How Many Super Bowls Did Montana Win, Joe Montana

*
Space constraints prevent paying appropriate homage to those whose committed service as Judges has made the Court that Appeals that Georgia a nationally respected institution. Indicative of the harmony which has constantly
*
been a hallmark of this bench is the reality that before the place of Chief referee was put on a rotating basis in 1979, there had actually been just seven chief Judges. Hill served for 6 years (1907-1913). His colleague, Russell, followed him because that a period from October 13, 1913 until June 1916, once he resigned to go back to the private exercise of law. The 3rd Chief Judge was Peyton L. Wade of Dublin, who became Judge in February 1914 and also Chief judge in 1916, serving three years in the capacity until his fatality on
*
August 22, 1919. His successor was Nash R. Broyles, who had involved the bench in 1914 and also was make Chief judge in 1919. Broyles" tenure as Chief Judge was the longest; he served 28 years as Chief Judge until his death in 1947 at the period of 78.
*
Following him was I. Homer Sutton, who offered from April 10, 1947, till January 15, 1954. His follower as chef Judge, Jule W. Felton, had the longest tenure of company as a judge on the Court, a total of 32 years and also eight month (three months longer than Broyles" complete tenure). Felton pertained to this bench in 1937 and was named Chief referee in 1954, occupying that position until 1969. Man Sammons Bell was elected Chief judge by his partner on September 5, 1969, after 10 year of business as Judge and also Presiding Judge, and also served 10 an ext years in this position.Readers who desire to recognize details concerning the deceased Judges are referred to the table of contents of memorials of Georgia"s appellate judges with 1973, which might be discovered in 230 Georgia XXVII. Tributes to retirement Judges, uncovered in 150 Georgia Appeals et seq., provide details regarding those Judges who have actually retired native the Court since 1979. Confirmation the each served well is noted by the fact that never, throughout the whole existence of the Court, has actually a referee been affirmed by operation of law since of fail to render a decision through the end of the term next after the at i beg your pardon a situation was docketed. Court portraits and also photographs of present and also past members the the Court of Appeals now hang in the banc room and courtroom.There have been just six persons who have served together Clerk of Court. The very first was Logan Bleckley, kid of the well known Chief righteousness Logan E. Bleckley. He offered from January 1, 1907, till his fatality in 1938. The second, william G. England, offered from 1938 till his retirement in 1957. The third Clerk, Morgan Thomas, was linked with this Court longer than any kind of other person. He served as Deputy Clerk to both precursors from October 24, 1934, till December 1957, and as Clerk indigenous that date until December 31, 1980. He was popularly and also accurately designated as "The Court"s Ambassador," and a tribute come him is found in 159 Georgia Appeals. The 4th Clerk, Alton Hawk, served from 1981 with 1986. The fifth Clerk, and the very first and just female salesperson of the Court, was Victoria McLaughlin, who offered from 1987 till December 31, 1993.By January 1, 1994, the Court had actually recognized the need for a Court Administrator. On the date, william L. Martin, III, ended up being the very first Clerk and also Court Administrator that the Court that Appeals of Georgia.Space limitations likewise make it important to omit referral to notable opinions. Suffice it come say that publications containing compilations of decision under such titles as "Wit and Wisdom in Court Opinions" always include reprints indigenous the Court the Appeals the Georgia. (See likewise former Court of Appeals referee H. Solar Clark"s "Judicial Humor(?): A an individual Reminiscence," 20 trial 68 et seq., association of psychological Lawyers of America, June 1984).An comprehensive bibliography has been appended to this history to provide resource material because that those who are interested in more information around the history of this court."Upon the integrity, wisdom and also independence the the judiciary depend the sacred legal rights of cost-free men and women."

(The initial research and also writing of the background of the Court that Appeals was
*
principally perfect by judge H. Sol Clark in 1977-1978. This history has to be revised and updated since then, mainly by Presiding judge Braswell D. Deen, Jr., in 1990 v contributions through the various other Judges on the Court.)BIBLIOGRAPHYGeorgia Official and also Statistical Register, room of Archives and History, State that Georgia.Bell, R. C. - "A instance in the Court of Appeals," 44 Ga. Bar association Reports 228 (1927).Bloch, Charles J. - "The can be fried Court and the Court the Appeals that Georgia," 23 Ga. Bar newspaper 523 (1961).Bolton, Arthur K. - Unpublished resolve to 1975 Georgia Bench and also Bar Conference in Savannah.Grice, Warren - The Georgia Bench and also Bar, J. W. Burke Co., 1931, Pages 372-383, chapter 21: "The facility of the Court the Appeals; The perfect of the Structure."Jordan, Robert H. - "A background of the Court that Appeals of Georgia," 24 Ga. Bar newspaper 371 (Feb. 1962).Pottle, J. R. - "Should over there Be two Courts that Last will in Georgia, and also If So how Should they Be related to Each Other?" 31 Ga. Bar association Reports 216 (1914).Powell, Arthur G. - I have the right to Go home Again, college of N.C. Press, 1943, chapter 37: "The birth of the Court that Appeals the Georgia," 2 Georgia Review, (Summer 1948), Pages 144-156.Stolz, Irwin W., Jr. - "Judicial Modernization: an Idea whose Time has actually Come." Georgia Defense Lawyers Association, 1972.11 Ga. Bar combination Reports - 1894 Meeting. "Report the Committee on requirement of Relief because that the supreme Court," web page 197; "Do us Need more Judges top top the can be fried Court?" web page 241.12 Ga. Bar association Reports - 1895 annual Meeting. Symposium on "Relief that the supreme Court the Georgia: Is the Remedy One or more Intermediate Courts?" Pages 21-45, and also two files on the topic "Is the Remedy One or an ext Intermediate Courts?" Pages 164-176.19 Ga. Bar association Reports - 1902 annual Meeting. Pages 34-42 and paper by righteousness Andrew J. Cobb entitled "The Judicial mechanism of Georgia: that is Defects; What transforms Are vital to Bring about a an ext Harmonious and Orderly System and also to relax the supreme Court?" Pages 182-195; and also "A propose Act creating District court of Appeals," by judge Pope Barrow, Pages 196-203.21 Ga. Bar association Reports - 1904 yearly Meeting, Pages 47-54, "Report the Committee on Court of Appeals."22 Ga. Bar combination Reports - 1905 annual Meeting, web page 22.23 Ga. Bar association Reports - 1906 yearly Meeting, Pages 34-52.24 Ga. Bar combination Reports - 1907 annual Meeting, Pages 17-18.32 Ga. Bar association Reports - 1915 annual Meeting, Pages 25-28.Georgia legislations 1906, Pages 24-28.Georgia legislations 1916, Pages 19-22 and also 56-57.Georgia legislations 1943, Pages 677-679.Georgia regulations 1960, Pages 158-161 and also 911-912.Georgia legislations 1961, Pages 140-142.Georgia legislations 1996, web page 405.Message that the governor of Georgia come the general Assembly, June 27, 1906.Message the the governor of Georgia to the general Assembly, June 26, 1907.Senate Journal, 1906, Pages 290, 310, 337 and also 354.House Journal, 1906, Pages Unavailable.Newspaper resources are the Atlanta Constitution, Atlanta Journal and Atlanta Georgian from July- respectable 1906 and January 1907.A history of the can be fried Court that Georgia - A Centennial Volume (J. W. Burke Co., 1948).