during his 4 years in the Senate Barack Obama, D-Ill., voted two dozen time to filibuster receipt he opposed. ALEX EDELMAN / Contributor / Getty images

For an ext than 200 years, the Senate’s approach to dealing with legislation has had actually a integrated bipartisan catalyst by giving the minority much more influence.

You are watching: How many filibusters in obama presidency

This distinctive attribute of the Senate is being threatened this particular day by those willing to permanently readjust the Senate come get an ext power.

The potential that a filibuster pushes the bulk to resolve the minority. It’s one of those “checks and also balances.”

Senators that both parties frequently say they want to legislate “on a bipartisan basis.”

On march 6, for example, Assistant bulk Leader cock Durbin, D-Ill., said it three time in one quick speech.

For much more than 200 years, the Senate’s strategy to taking care of legislation has had a integrated bipartisan motivation by giving the minority more influence. This distinctive attribute of the Senate is gift threatened today by those willing to permanently adjust the Senate come get much more power.

Senate rules need that, if a simple majority can pass a bill, a supermajority that at the very least 60 must very first vote to finish debate.

The potential the a filibuster, i beg your pardon occurs as soon as that threshold is no met, pushes the majority to deal with the minority. It’s among those “checks and also balances” that assist keep too lot power from finishing up in too few hands.

Both parties have used extended dispute to their benefit when in the minority, and have been frustrated by its use once in the majority. But both have accepted that extended debate not only defines the Senate as an institution, but is a valuable feature the the legislative process.

During his 4 years in the Senate, because that example, Barack Obama, D-Ill., voted two dozen times to filibuster receipt he opposed. The voted come filibuster the nationwide Defense Authorization action in 2005, the Securing America’s boundaries Act in 2006, and the FISA Amendments act in 2008. He additionally voted come filibuster receipt to repeal the commonwealth estate tax, to lull the regulation of leases for oil and also gas exploration on federal lands, and also to prohibit taking a minor across state present to gain an abortion.

When Republicans, climate in the majority, taken into consideration terminating the filibuster in 2005, Obama safeguarded it no as a partisan political weapon, however as a critical part the the legislature process. He urged his Senate colleagues to rise over the “ends justify the means” mentality that could lead to institutional alters with long-term implications just to get some short-lived political victories.

Every senator, Obama said, “knows that if the bulk chooses to end the filibuster … the fighting, the bitterness, and the gridlock will only get worse.”

One party, “be it Republican or Democrat,” should not have the ability to “change the rule in the center of the video game so they deserve to make all the decisions while the other party is told to sit down and keep quiet,” he said.

“That’s straightforward for you to say” is a tempting response since, at the time, Democrats to be in the minority and using the filibuster come block both legislation and also nominations. Talk, after ~ all, is no cheaper anywhere than it is in Washington, D.C. However Obama not just said the extended debate should no be minimal then, however told senators that that “one day Democrats will certainly be in the majority again” and abolishing extended controversy “will be no fairer come a Republican minority than it is to a democratic minority.”

Suggesting that his defense of the filibuster was more about principle than crass politics, Obama took the position that Democrats need to not try to limit extended controversy the following time they were in the majority.

Well, below we are.

Democrats occupy the White House and also control both chambers of Congress. The politics planets have actually aligned, and also now that is time to watch whether Obama’s opinion of extended controversy really does remain the same when the various other party can use it.

See more: How Many Calories In A Pancake With Butter And Syrup Nutrition Facts

Speaking at the funeral the Rep. John Lewis, D-Ga., last year, Obama called the filibuster a “Jim crow relic” and said it need to be eliminated so that Democrats could pass regulation they wanted. Yet didn’t Obama say the one party need to not it is in able to readjust the rules “so they have the right to make every the decision while the various other party is told come sit down and also keep quiet”? 

Yes, the did. 

When he protected using the filibuster versus legislation the he opposed, Obama said: “I urge my Republican colleagues not to go with with transforming these rules. In the long run, it is no a an excellent result because that either party.” yet when the filibuster could be used against legislation that supports, Obama currently urges democrats colleagues to execute the opposite.

This kind of political opportunism brings to mental a senator’s counsel that talk of abolishing the filibuster “is much more about power 보다 fairness.”

“I believe some of mine colleagues suggest this rule adjust because castle can get away through it, quite than due to the fact that they know it is good for our democracy.”