The Chicago Blackhawks might be so great that "they gained black world loving hockey," yet the NHL is tho the most segregated experienced sport. Why is that?


You are watching: How many black people in nhl

*

You’ve watched the video a thousand times: a tv news anchor reports near a riled-up crowd; a fan, possibly invited—oftentimes not—yells other inappropriate into the microphone; the organize fumbles come recover; the video goes viral.

On Monday night, hrs after the Chicago Blackhawks had won their third Stanley Cup in six years and thousands that fans had actually taken come the highways in celebration, WGN’s Marcus Leshock appeared destined to suffer something similar. As he stopped a passing pan for a brief interview, Leshock cautioned: "You’re live top top the air." With almost no hesitation, and also a precursory "this sounds messed up," the fan, that was black, said the Blackhawks room so awesome that "they acquired black people loving hockey."


It was an unforeseen comment, and also one that left the anchors, and the Internet, laughing. But, of course, there’s reality in humor. Hockey has constantly been a sport overcame by white players and also spectators—and in its shortest moments, it can even be aggressively racist. Today, 58 year after Willie O’Ree, the first black NHL player, took to the ice, only five percent that the league is black, follow to a report by NPR in February. This is in stark comparison to various other sports leagues: 67 percent of football player in the NFL room black; 77 percent in the NBA, follow to pair reports by the university of main Florida. This poses an amazing question: What room the cultural, economic, or sociological components that work to segregate part sports much more than others?




See more: How Many Aircraft Carrier Us Have, Here'S Every Aircraft Carrier In The World

For decades, researchers have actually explored the exclusionary nature that appears to linger in details sports. There are a couple of theories regarding why this prejudice exists, but most experts agree that cost is the key culprit. In hockey, this is an especially pronounced. With ice time, travel, and also a seemingly unlimited list of compelled equipment, hockey has an especially huge economic obstacle to entry. Study by Florida Atlantic college sociologist thomas C. Wilson verified a direct connection between wealth and people's likelihood to attend or get involved in a sport. "Those wealthy in economic resources are an ext involved in sports generally, presumably due to the fact that they can far better afford their cost, both in regards to money and leisure time," Wilson writes. And, the course, there's a stark race-to-wealth differential in the united States.

What room the cultural, economic, or sociological determinants that work-related to segregate some sports an ext than others?

The absence of diversity ~ above the ice is mirrored by the fanbase as well. Follow to a 2013 Nielsen report, 92 percent of NHL viewers space white and only 3 percent black. Friend don't require an expensive set of sticks or pads to watch hockey, so what’s steering the distinction there? A 2013 joint record from researchers at Penn State University, college of north Florida, and also Alfred State college explored the issue of decimal spectator attendance transparent the sports world. Your conclusion: things like the entertainment worth of the sport, the social nature, the atmosphere, and also the convenience are major motivation drivers—but the most far-reaching factor to be previous exposure and/or accessibility to the sport. "ultural affiliation is a viable motive because that African Americans’ sports consumption," the authors write. "Therefore, it seems plausible that environmental or socialization procedures play a larger duty in afri Americans’ sport attendance and also consumption."


Exclusion indigenous sports favor hockey features as a sort of self-perpetuating loop. In Wilson’s aforementioned paper, he draws a similar conclusion: civilization create society networks based on their similarity in class and taste. Simply being a part of a taste-based society network offers some with an ext access to product or symbolic goods than that does to others. Sports function as a kind of ritual identification, says Wilson; oftentimes "neither no one those lock exclude necessarily intend or also recognize the society reproductive implications."

The absence of diversity in hockey—both top top the ice and also in the stands—is not necessarily defined by the nature that the sports itself, however instead by the cyclical feedback that its affluent, white culture. Echoing this sentiment, william Douglas, editor that the blog shade of Hockey, said the Chicago Tribune critical week: "Not see players of shade on the ice on a regular basis or not knowing there room players of color ... Reinforces the stereotype. Then it became a self-fulfilling prophecy that sorts."

There's great news, though: This is changing. And, to no one’s surprise, the many recent winner the the Stanley Cup is leading the way. In the same Tribune article, it's reported that the variety of black Chicagoans who identify themselves as very or somewhat interested in the Hawks raised from 12.6 percent in 2011 to 21.9 percent in 2014. And amongst those fans, the number that watched a video game on TV or listened top top the radio prospered from 28.1 come 37.9 percent end that same span.