Disclosure statement

The authors carry out not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and also have disclosed no appropriate affiliations beyond their scholastic appointment.

You are watching: How long does supreme court serve



justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Brooks Kraft LLC/Corbis via Getty pictures

And castle do. Justice Clarence cutting board was appointed by president George H.W. Shrub at period 43 in 1991 and famously claimed he would serve for 43 years. There’s another 13 years until his promise is met.

The court’s newest member, Donald Trump’s nominee Amy Coney Barrett, was 48 when she took she seat in so late 2020 after the death of 87-year-old righteousness Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

Ginsburg, a Clinton appointee that joined the court at age 60 in 1993, refused to retire. Once liberals pressed she to action down throughout the presidency of Democrat Barack Obama come ensure a like-minded replacement, she protested: “So tell me that the president could have nominated this spring that you would quite see top top the court than me?”

Partisanship problems

Justices adjust during their decades on the bench, research shows.

Justices that at the time of their confirmation espoused views the reflected the general public, the Senate and the president who appointed them often tend to relocate away indigenous those preferences over time. Lock become an ext ideological, concentrated on placing their very own policy preferences into law. Because that example, Ginsburg grew an ext liberal end time, while Thomas has actually become an ext conservative.

Other Americans’ political preferences tend to be steady throughout their lives.

The an effect is that can be fried Court justices may no longer reflect the America castle preside over. This deserve to be problematic. If the court to be to regularly stray too much from the public’s values, the public can reject that dictates. The can be fried Court relies on windy confidence to keep its legitimacy.

Life tenure has likewise turned staffing the can be fried Court right into an significantly partisan process, politicizing one of the country most powerful institutions.

In the 1980s and 1990s, can be fried Court nominees could generally expect large, bipartisan support in the Senate. Today, judicial check votes are almost strictly under party lines. Public support for judicial nominees likewise shows huge differences between Democrats and Republicans.

Life tenure deserve to turn supposedly elevation judges into political players that attempt to time their departures come secure their desired successors, together Justice Anthony Kennedy did in 2018. Trump appointed Brett Kavanaugh, among Kennedy’s former clerks, to change him.


justice Anthony Kennedy receiving the 2019 Liberty Medal native Justice Neil Gorsuch. William thomas Cain/Getty pictures

The proposed solution

Many supreme Court professionals have coalesced approximately a equipment to this problems: staggered, 18-year terms v a vacancy automatically emerging every two years in nonelection years.

This system would promote judicial legitimacy, castle argue, through taking exit decisions out of the justices’ hands. That would aid insulate the court from ending up being a campaign issue since vacancies would no longer arise during election years. And it would maintain judicial independence by shielding the court from political calls come fundamentally change the institution.

Partisanship would certainly still tint the an option and confirmation of judges through the president and Senate, however, and ideological extremists can still with the can be fried Court. But they would certainly be minimal to 18-year terms.

The U.S. Can be fried Court is among the world’s couple of high court to have actually life tenure. Practically all autonomous nations have either solved terms or obligated retirement eras for their top judges. Foreign courts have actually encountered few problems v term limits.

Even England – the nation on i m sorry the U.S. Version is based – no much longer grants its can be fried Court judge life tenure. They must now retire at 70.

Similarly, although plenty of U.S. States at first granted their supreme court judges life tenure, this changed during the Jacksonian era the the 1810s come 1840s when states seek to rise the accountability that the righteousness branch. Today, only supreme court judges in Rhode Island have actually life tenure. All various other states either have mandatory retirement ages or allow voters pick when judges leave the bench v judicial elections.


ago in 1894, the can be fried Court was older – no to point out whiter and all male. C.M. Bell/Library of Congress/Corbis/VCG via Getty images

Polling consistently mirrors a big bipartisan majority of americans support finishing life tenure. This most likely reflects eroding windy confidence together the court routinely worries decisions under partisan present on the day’s many controversial issues. Return ideology has long affected Supreme Court decisions, today’s court is unusual because all the conservative justices are Republicans and also all the liberal justices room Democrats.

In April 2021, president Biden created a committee to research reforming the can be fried Court, consisting of term-limiting justices. To finish the justices’ life tenure would most likely mean a constitution amendment requiring approval indigenous two-thirds of both homes of Congress and also three-fourths the U.S. States.

Ultimately, Congress, the states and the windy they stand for will decision whether the country’s centuries-old lifetime tenure system still serves the demands of the American people.

See more: How Many Calories Does A Dunkin Donut Have, How Many Calories Are In Glazed Doughnuts

<The Conversation’s politics + culture editors pick need-to-know stories. authorize up for national politics Weekly.>