In 2016 Donald Trump had the ability to win the White home while at the same time losing the national popular vote. Richard Johnson watch at whether the incumbent president may be able to do the exact same thing again this year. That writes that because of how the Electoral university works, throughout the 30 says which backed him in 2016, Trump got over 8.3 million ‘surplus’ votes in 2016. Trump could still win next week even if the performs slightly much less well in most of 2016’s red states, while doing very well in key marginal states like Pennsylvania.

You are watching: How is winning trump or clinton


In 2016, Donald Trump came to be the second US president in as many decades to victory an election without to win the most votes throughout the country. Donald Trump winner a majority of states and also their matching Electoral university votes (EVs), however Hillary Clinton won practically 2.9 million an ext votes nationally. In 2020, Joe Biden watch assured to success the well-known vote, the seventh time a Democrat has actually done for this reason in the last eight elections. Yet, the an essential question remains: can Trump pull off an Electoral College bulk once more, even when he is rolling Biden considerably in the popular vote?

A good starting point is to ask, ‘Was the disproportionality in Clinton’s Electoral university loss in 2016 as bad as it could get?’. The answer, in short, is no. First, Clinton’s popular vote benefit over Donald Trump to be wholly a product the the size of her bulk in California. California is one absolutely enormous state. There are practically 40 million Californians, around 12 percent the the whole US population. One in ten votes cast in the 2016 united state presidential choice were in California (14.2 million out of 136.7 million). A candidate that wins California is currently 20 percent that the method to one Electoral College majority from the state alone.

The wasted votes that California and other states

In 2016, Hillary Clinton winner California with 61.7 percent the the vote, giving her a majority over Donald trump card of 4,269,978. In effect, 4,269,977 of these votes were wasted. Clinton only need a bulk of 1 vote, no 4.3 million, in stimulate to success the state’s 55 electoral votes. This truth is important since as California trends significantly Democratic, it assures to skew the national famous vote totals more. Virtually a million civilization in California (943,998) voted because that a third-party candidate in 2016. Because that the sake of argument, stop say those voter went for Joe Biden this time around. Holding all equal, Biden would victory California with a majority of 5.2 million. Since California is so big, also this modest shift in one state would have a notable effect on the well-known vote, increasing the national well-known votes to the democrats by almost a complete percentage point (0.7 points).

Second, Trump’s success in 2016 was not maximally efficient. In one sense, trumped won really efficiently. That secured an extremely narrow majorities (a complete of 77,744 votes) in three crucial swing states (namely Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin) which provided him 46 Electoral college votes, depriving Clinton of an Electoral university majority. Nonetheless, Trump could have won the same variety of states v millions under popular votes than he actually received. Maximum efficiency under the Electoral College means wining a state by a margin that 1 vote. Because that example, Trump won Texas through a bulk of 807,179 votes, but in effect, he might have excellent without 807,178 of these votes. A bulk of just one vote would certainly still deliver 100 percent that Texas’s 38 electoral votes to Donald Trump.

Across the 30 ‘red’ (Republican) says which backed him in 2016, Trump collected 8,357,640 surplus votes. If every one of these trump voters had actually stayed at residence on choice day, trump would have still defeated Hillary Clinton. The underlying Electoral college map would have been exactly the same, but the renowned vote totals would look really different. In this scenario, trump would have actually been elected president with just 42.6 percent that the well-known vote contrasted to Hillary Clinton’s 51.3 percent, a void of 8.7 percent. Hillary Clinton’s win in the blue says were also inefficient, even an ext so than Donald Trump’s red state victories. Clinton winner a surplus 11,226,316 votes throughout the 20 ‘blue’ (Democratic) states. These surplus votes help to describe her popular vote plurality. Indeed, if Clinton had burned these 11.2 million excess votes, she would have actually won the same variety of states, yet lost come Trump in the popular vote fairly heavily: 43.5 percent come Trump’s 50.2 percent.

How Trump could still win the Electoral College despite Biden’s lead

In the last weeks that the 2020 election, Joe Biden has appreciated a steady advantage in national polls, which attempt to measure up the famous vote. Simply 9 days prior to the election, Biden’s median polling lead is 8.0 points over Trump. Might Trump defeat Biden despite trailing the so much? In a word, yes. There space three factors that could an outcome in a trumped Electoral College success on together a bad popular vote showing.

First, trump card performs less well in the red says than he did in 2016, in order to making his red state victories much less ‘inefficient’. Yes some proof to suggest that this is happening. Texas this time is a swing state, conversely, in 2016 it to be assumed come be for sure for Trump. Together of the moment of writing, Trump has a 2.6 median poll lead in Texas, conversely, in 2016 he winner the state through 9 points. Let’s imagine Trump just wins Texas by 1 suggest (a bulk of around 80,000 votes on 2016 numbers). This is a much an ext ‘efficient’ success for Trump, however it can depress his national famous vote totals by around three soldier of a million votes.


“Pushpins in a map end the U.S.A.” by Marc Levin is licensed under CC through 2.0

This pattern can be replicated across the claims Trump won in 2016. Trump winner Ohio with a 446,841-vote surplus. If the wins the state again, it’s not likely to be by as plenty of wasted votes. Trump winner Georgia by 204,555 in 2016. If he wins that in 2020, it’s likely to be a bulk in the tens of thousands, perhaps also fewer. 600,000 Trump voter in Tennessee could have never displayed up in 2016, and no one would have noticed, other than to the level that trump would have dropped half a percentage allude in the national famous vote.

The second factor is that Trump requirements to carry out especially well in a handful of crucial marginal states which have tendency to decide elections. In 2016, over there were seven states determined by 50,000 votes or fewer: Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, new Hampshire, Maine, Nevada, and also Minnesota (70 electoral votes). Trump card won three of this states, receiving 47 Electoral university votes. In reality, trump only essential to win among these 7 (Pennsylvania) to secure an Electoral university majority. In 2020, Trump might afford to shed Michigan, Wisconsin, and also one other little state (e.g., Iowa) indigenous his 2016 coalition, as long as he holds Pennsylvania. Ripe days before the election, Biden enjoys a 5 suggest lead in Pennsylvania. If Trump to be to shed all seven of the many marginal says from 2016, it’s video game over. If the wins Pennsylvania, he’s odds on favourite to win.

The 3rd factor is Biden outperforming Hillary Clinton in the blue states. This is fairly plausible. A huge number of blue state voters in 2016 look at voted because that a third-party candidate, such together the eco-friendly Party’s Jill Stein as a ‘protest’ vote versus the unpopular Clinton, learning that your vote would certainly not do a distinction in the Electoral College. Biden, who has greater favorable than Clinton, can gain about half a million ex-Green voter in California, Illinois, and new York alone. In addition, animus versus Trump appears to it is in driving high turnout in democratic areas. It’s no infeasible that Biden could win part blue says by also bigger margins 보다 Hillary Clinton in 2016. This would demonstrably journey up Biden’s well-known vote success without poignant the Electoral university map.

With all this being said, one 8-point famous vote lead for Biden would certainly mean, in every probability, a Biden victory. Over there is a well line between maximum efficiency and catastrophe: a fruit loss in Texas or Florida might end Trump’s electoral chances. If Biden’s poll lead in Pennsylvania holds, trump card is in trouble. When a Trump win is by no way infeasible, the balance of probability proceeds to favour Biden in the final stretch the the campaign.

Please read our comments policy before commenting.

Note: This write-up gives the views of the author, and not the place of USAPP – American Politics and Policy, nor the London college of Economics.

See more: How Many Planes Delivered Cash To Iran, Was Obama’S $1

Shortened URL for this post:

About the author

Richard JohnsonQueen Mary, university of LondonRichard Johnson join Queen mar as Lecturer in US politics & plan in 2020. Previously, he was a lecturer in ~ Lancaster University. With a focus on race and American autonomous development, he has written about African American candidates in primarily white contexts, the ‘two Reconstructions’, liberal Republicans and also civil rights, school segregation, the racial national politics of Barack Obama’s Chicago, the fundraising techniques of working-class candidates, racially polarised partisanship, and also the racial policies of the Obama and Trump administrations.